What is the criteria for displaying the information of Media Info of torrents?
I have seen that it is not displayed site wide for all torrents but for few. Sometimes, it creates on its own without help of uploader description page and sometimes it does not appear even when uploader has provided it in description and sometimes it does not appear at all irrespective of there is a description or not.
Do we users have the ability to request it?
I have seen that it is not displayed site wide for all torrents but for few. Sometimes, it creates on its own without help of uploader description page and sometimes it does not appear even when uploader has provided it in description and sometimes it does not appear at all irrespective of there is a description or not.
Do we users have the ability to request it?
Completed
There's to much Asian content in the Book department on the home page .. Any way to get rid of it and make a separate category for it .
Feature Request: Sort Followed Series by Recently Added Torrents
It would be a great improvement if users could sort the series in their profile by most recently updated torrents.
Being able to see which followed series have new uploads at a glance would make the site much more efficient to use,
instead of having to open each series individually to check for updates.
This feature would significantly enhance usability, or did i overlook some features
It would be a great improvement if users could sort the series in their profile by most recently updated torrents.
Being able to see which followed series have new uploads at a glance would make the site much more efficient to use,
instead of having to open each series individually to check for updates.
This feature would significantly enhance usability, or did i overlook some features
Under Review
When you search for a torrent, the list of results has a column, "Age". That shows the approximate age of the torrent, e.g. "Three years ago". If you hover over it you see the exact date "03 October 2022". So that's fine.
But when you click on the torrent name, the page for the torrent has "Added 3 years ago by ...".
There is no indication of the exact date on that page. No popup date.
It can be important to see the exact date; e.g. there are several releases in a short time, the early ones had errors so the later have fixes.
It's possible you find different torrents with different searches, so to see the exact dates you have to redo the searches.
So please either use the same popup with exact date as on the search results page, or just show the actual date as plain text instead of the approximate "x years ago".
But when you click on the torrent name, the page for the torrent has "Added 3 years ago by ...".
There is no indication of the exact date on that page. No popup date.
It can be important to see the exact date; e.g. there are several releases in a short time, the early ones had errors so the later have fixes.
It's possible you find different torrents with different searches, so to see the exact dates you have to redo the searches.
So please either use the same popup with exact date as on the search results page, or just show the actual date as plain text instead of the approximate "x years ago".
Rejected
Maybe it's just me, but I see ads when I want to search, when the results are shown, when I click to see one file, when I spend more than 20(?) seconds reading the mediainfo... Isn't that too much? I mean, I understand that running this website isn't free nor cheap and I am thankful because you let us use it for free. Just asking to know if this is normal, a bug or a temporary measure.
Thank you for you attention and for any reply.
Thank you for you attention and for any reply.
Under Review
When you fail to scrape a torrent when someone presses update do not reset the counts to 0/0. Leave counts as they previously were.
Under Review
The new layout with new features is great. Please don't break it.
Under Review
I wouldn't mind seeing a Music Video section added. Being able to share a collection of video hits would be great, helps for parties.
If you accidentally upload to wrong category edit doesn't allow you to change that. Please allow change category.
Under Review
It seems that some (ab)users use their VPN to circumnavigate their bans.
I would like to suggest banning their network cards mac addresses.
This has to be implemented server-side, obviously.
and yes, it's not a fail save, but still, it would create more of an obstacle, not everyone knows how to spoof their address.
I would like to suggest banning their network cards mac addresses.
This has to be implemented server-side, obviously.
and yes, it's not a fail save, but still, it would create more of an obstacle, not everyone knows how to spoof their address.
Under Review
On the TV Series page, using multiple filters of the same type (e.g. genre) will add them as AND conditions and return series that match all of them so selecting Action and Comedy will only return action-comedies. There should be an option to change the condition to OR to enable this to return all shows tagged as either action or comedy.
Under Review
Under Review
Report torrent is rendering on top of the drop down when you click the pull down under your user id.
steps to reproduce: go to a torrent, scrunch your window enough so that when you click your user id to get the pull down, report torrent will be on top of the pull down.
steps to reproduce: go to a torrent, scrunch your window enough so that when you click your user id to get the pull down, report torrent will be on top of the pull down.
I think it'd be useful to have the ability to follow other users and an option to get a notification when they upload a new torrent
Thanks
Thanks
Under Review
Is there a way to stop torrent narcs from operating on EXT, I'm getting a large number of copyright infringement complaints from my ISP.
Under Review
Too many indian content showing up on the homepage and search results. An option to block them all will be pleasent.
Under Review
Here is a suggestion, why don't you shutdown all the losers who are filling this site with torrents loaded with viruses, when i first found this site it was good, but it has really gone down hill since then.
Under Review
It would be really nice if either the uploader puts on CAM if it is a CAM upload or perhaps the admin can create a CAM category. Every once in a while we get a good cam but mostly they are not. Personally, I would wait until a real upload if I knew it was a CAM
Under Review
Chat section? or at least a way to ask questions?
These are all 4k:
3840 x 2080 (1440p/QHD)
3832 x 2076 (1440p/QHD)
3840 x 1608 (1440p/QHD)
3840 x 1600 (1440p/QHD)
2876 x 2156
These are all 1080p
1920 x 1040 (720p/HD)
1920 x 960 (720p/HD)
1920 x 872 (720p/HD)
1920 x 804 (720p/HD)
1440 x 1080
16:9 calcs
If the frame is 3840 wide it is 4k
stop processing
If the frame is 1920 wide is 1080p
stop processing
4:3 calcs
if the frame is 2160 high it is 4k
stop processing
if the frame is 1080 high is 1080p
stop processing
4:3 4k
2880 × 2160 is also 4k
4:3 1080p
1440 × 1080
Here is some fuzzy logic:
3840 x 2080 (1440p/QHD)
3832 x 2076 (1440p/QHD)
3840 x 1608 (1440p/QHD)
3840 x 1600 (1440p/QHD)
2876 x 2156
These are all 1080p
1920 x 1040 (720p/HD)
1920 x 960 (720p/HD)
1920 x 872 (720p/HD)
1920 x 804 (720p/HD)
1440 x 1080
16:9 calcs
If the frame is 3840 wide it is 4k
stop processing
If the frame is 1920 wide is 1080p
stop processing
4:3 calcs
if the frame is 2160 high it is 4k
stop processing
if the frame is 1080 high is 1080p
stop processing
4:3 4k
2880 × 2160 is also 4k
4:3 1080p
1440 × 1080
Here is some fuzzy logic:
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import argparse
def classify_resolution(width, height):
"""
Classify video resolution as 4K, 1080p, 720p, or 480p.
Args:
width: Video width in pixels
height: Video height in pixels
Returns:
str: Resolution classification
"""
# 16:9 calculations (width-based)
if width == 3840:
return "4K"
if width == 1920:
return "1080p"
if width == 1280:
return "720p"
if width == 854 or width == 848 or width == 720:
return "480p"
# 4:3 calculations (height-based)
if height == 2160:
return "4K"
if height == 1080:
return "1080p"
if height == 720:
return "720p"
if height == 480:
return "480p"
# Fallback: classify by approximate pixel count
total_pixels = width * height
if total_pixels >= 8_000_000: # ~4K threshold (3840x2160 = 8,294,400)
return "4K"
elif total_pixels >= 1_400_000: # ~1080p threshold (midpoint between 720p and 1080p)
return "1080p"
elif total_pixels >= 600_000: # ~720p threshold (midpoint between 480p and 720p)
return "720p"
elif total_pixels >= 300_000: # ~480p threshold
return "480p"
else:
return "Unknown (below 480p)"
def main():
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(
description='Classify video resolution',
formatter_class=argparse.ArgumentDefaultsHelpFormatter
)
parser.add_argument('-w', '--width', type=int, required=True,
help='Video width in pixels')
parser.add_argument('-t', '--height', type=int, required=True,
help='Video height in pixels')
args = parser.parse_args()
resolution = classify_resolution(args.width, args.height)
print(f"{args.width} x {args.height} is classified as: {resolution}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
Showing 20 of 125 suggestions
Latest News
Latest Searches
Sites In Our Index
Suggestion Box
Share your ideas to help improve our community